Talk:2022 FIFA World Cup
Latest comment: 14 days ago by 2A02:587:6D15:9300:DC93:5FED:E732:4E84 in topic Semi-protected edit request on 3 April 2025
 | 2022 FIFA World Cup has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2022 FIFA World Cup article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 14 days  |
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
 | Material from 2022 FIFA World Cup was split to other pages. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter pages, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter pages exist. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution.
|
 | A news item involving 2022 FIFA World Cup was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 20 November 2022. |  |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2022, when it received 46,794,250 views. |
| This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 11 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
 |
This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
Refs
edit- Alfarizi, Mohammad Hanaan. Human Rights Abused in Qatar: FIFA Puts World Cup More Than Lives? Jurnal Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan. Vol 4, No 2 (2023).
Wrong Knockout stage results
editThe final was between Argentina and France. This article shows Argentina and Spain. There are also several wrong match results. 100.15.89.222 (talk) 18:56, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Final standings
editHi! We've previously removed these sections because FIFA haven't made such announcements on newer tournaments. Should we really be making unofficial rankings based on an article by the Sporting News? Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 16:08, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Messi
edit@Marco Carrasco: Regarding this edit, where you toned down the wording "based on source", where exactly does the source say that it took Messi the World Cup victory to only become regarded as "one of the greatest" players of all time? He very much was already seen as one of the greatest, and indeed by quite a few as the single greatest, and the World Cup was the only accolade he was missing. The text is quite long and I wasn't able to read it all, but I did see the following posted about him: "a man with no boxes left to tick in his career, a player who can rightly claim his place in the argument as the best of all time". This certainly does not justify the change, even if milder statements also exist in the publication. --Theurgist (talk) 17:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Absolutely correct. Those who changed it and kept it that way for quite some time had an oblique agenda. Wikipedia should not operate that way. If the credible sources state that he needed it to become "the" greatest, not merely "one of the" greatest - which credible sources establish that he was regarded as such since at least 2010-2011, it's highly manipulative to pervert the language of the 2022-2023 sources which are very clear in stating that they are talking about him now being regarded as "the" greatest, not "one of the". If anything it's almost Orwellian to try distort sources and language in such a way. Wikipedia must not be abused by those with a hidden agenda. The sources are very clear stating that it is about him being regarded as "the" greatest. 165.140.231.11 (talk) 22:35, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 3 April 2025
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Should we add the final stadings like what we did in this one? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_FIFA_World_Cup#Final_standings 2A02:587:6D15:9300:FD4F:4F7E:8118:F80C (talk) 14:14, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done for now I think it's a good idea but we should wait until after the tournament to add one. Adeletron 3030 (talk • edits) 15:26, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
